WORKED EXAMPLES
We'd rather show you how this is designed to be used than fabricate customer logos.
Modelled scenarios across legal practice. Indicative figures, our published pricing, no actor-paid testimonials. If you want a reference call, ask — we'll arrange one.
Illustrative — not real customer data. The scenarios below are modelled examples of how Serverity is designed to be used. Figures reflect indicative usage at our published pricing model. Real outcomes depend on team workflow, matter complexity and the user's own assumptions.
Employment chambers — 5 barristers
Situation
A 5-member employment set is spending 4-6 hours per matter on case preparation, with junior tenants stretched managing authority bundles for tribunal hearings.
How Serverity fits
Serverity handles brief ingestion, chronology extraction, issue identification, and authority verification. The List of Authorities generator produces OSCOLA-formatted lists with pinpoint citations in minutes.
3.5 hrs
Modelled saving per matter
10 mins
Authority bundle preparation
Indicative
Cost reflects usage-only pricing
5x
Modelled payback multiple
High-street solicitor — sole practitioner
Situation
A sole practitioner handling employment, housing and family matters wants to tighten client communications and intake quality.
How Serverity fits
Automated client update emails, intake pipeline, and AI-assisted engagement letters help every client receive regular updates and proper onboarding. Outputs reviewed by the practitioner before sending.
Tighter
Communication cadence
70%
Modelled intake-time reduction
2 mins
Engagement letter draft
Indicative
Usage-only cost
Small litigation firm — 8 fee earners
Situation
An 8-person litigation firm wants shared visibility across matters: who the opponents are, which matters look at risk, and where firm-wide patterns emerge.
How Serverity fits
Opponent intelligence shares opposing-solicitor history across firm matters. Case health checks flag at-risk matters. Outcome tracking surfaces patterns by practice area, drawn from the firm's own concluded matters.
Day one
Opponent context on new matters
At-risk
Flagged matters surface early
Firm-wide
Outcome-pattern visibility
Indicative
Usage-only cost
Consumer self-representation — employment tribunal
Situation
A self-represented claimant facing a respondent with a large employment law firm. No legal background, first time in a tribunal.
How Serverity fits
Progressive disclosure walks them through each stage — document upload, chronology, issues, drafting, bundle assembly. A second AI pass cross-checks each draft and surfaces gaps for the user to resolve.
Filing-ready
Hearing bundle prepared without a solicitor
Sourced
Authorities cross-checked
Second pass
Cross-check on every draft
Indicative
Usage-only cost